ADHD is one of the most common childhood conditions worldwide, affecting around 5% of children and teens. Kids with ADHD often face challenges with focus, behavior, and emotions, which can impact their schoolwork, friendships, and daily life. Recently, there’s been a rise in tech-based tools for ADHD, like computer games for cognitive training, neurofeedback, brain stimulation, eye-tracking devices, and apps for time and task management (like 30/30® and Task Timer®). While these tools can sound exciting, only a few—neurofeedback, cognitive training, and direct current stimulation—have substantial research backing them. Studies suggest that these specific tools can sometimes improve focus and academic performance and may help with ADHD symptoms.
Even though these treatments might sound promising, the actual research shows mixed results. Many studies haven’t met the high standards needed to prove effectiveness, and results are often biased or don’t cover all core ADHD symptoms, like inattention and impulsivity. Additionally, some studies focus on specific groups of children, such as boys aged 7-12, so we don’t know if these tools work as well for girls, younger kids, or teenagers.
Technology-based treatments can seem attractive because they offer an alternative to medication. However, they can also be costly and time-consuming, which may be difficult for some families. If you’re interested in these treatments, it’s essential to talk to a healthcare provider about the pros, cons, and costs. These tools are generally still experimental and may work best when combined with proven treatments, like medication or behavioral therapy.
While there are newer tools, like virtual reality and mobile games that might be more engaging for kids, more research is needed to prove their effectiveness. In short, while tech-based ADHD treatments are evolving, families should weigh their options carefully, considering what’s best for their child’s unique needs.
This article is based on Dr. Avion’s doctoral dissertation, which was a meta-analysis that examined the research described in this article. Click here to learn more about her.